Thursday 12 November 2015

What does The Secret River say about ownership of land?

The ownership of land is certainly a main theme in the novel. Grenville highlights the discrepancies between the white European and aboriginal worldview regarding land; however, she also presents a range of positions within each worldview.


For example, Thomas Blackwood unequivocally condemns the violence Smasher Sullivan and Sagitty Birtels unleash on the native Aborigines. At the same time, Blackwood deeply values the western conception of private property. To Blackwood, land ownership is a privilege to be...

The ownership of land is certainly a main theme in the novel. Grenville highlights the discrepancies between the white European and aboriginal worldview regarding land; however, she also presents a range of positions within each worldview.


For example, Thomas Blackwood unequivocally condemns the violence Smasher Sullivan and Sagitty Birtels unleash on the native Aborigines. At the same time, Blackwood deeply values the western conception of private property. To Blackwood, land ownership is a privilege to be treasured. Additionally, he believes that it is possible to enjoy this privilege while living peacefully among the natives:


"Ain't nothing in this world just for the taking.... A man got to pay a fair price for taking. Matter of give a little, take a little."

The yearning to call a plot of land one's own is sometimes regarded as a western impulse, and men like Blackwood and Thornhill recognize this. Due to Thornhill's convict status and previously impoverished background, land ownership is a means to freedom, personal agency, and autonomy:


"He let himself imagine it: standing on the crest of that slope, looking down over his own place. Thornhill's Point. It was a piercing hunger in his guts: to own it. To say mine, in a way he had never been able to say mine of anything at all."

Yet Thornhill and Blackwood understand something of the Aboriginal connection to the land. The Aborigines are masters at supporting their way of life with skills amassed from long years of experience. Their days are managed with such organic simplicity that they inspire envy in the white settlers:


...the blacks were farmers no less than the white men were. But they did not bother to build a fence to keep the animals from getting out. Instead, they created a tasty patch to lure them in. Either way, it meant meat for dinner.
There were no signs that the blacks felt that the place belonged to them. They had no fences that said this is mine. No house that said, this is our home. There were no fields or flocks that said, we have put the labor of our hands into this place.

Thornhill notes that his household is up with the dawn, clearing the land, lugging water, and chopping wood. By the end of the day, all are exhausted and have little energy to spare. In contrast, the natives spend only a little time each day on their work. Yet they always have plenty of kangaroo meat to eat and time to play with their children.


As for the Aborigines, many are content to live peacefully among the settlers. Others are uneasy when they see portions of their land parceled out to white owners. Some of these Aborigines decide to fight back, and the novel delineates their actions in doing so. However, a final, bloody conflict between the Aborigines and the white settlers demonstrates that the two opposing views regarding land ownership may never be fully reconciled.

No comments:

Post a Comment

How are race, gender, and class addressed in Oliver Optic's Rich and Humble?

While class does play a role in Rich and Humble , race and class aren't addressed by William Taylor Adams (Oliver Opic's real name) ...